CommunityWikiThemesRSSSyndicate AnnouncementsNone!CommunitiesMeatballWikiCraoWikiS-23 wikialso aid our wiki-nodeWeblogswikiSquaredSome ContributorsAlexSchroeder (bliki)AustinKing (home)BayleShanks (bliki)BrandonCsSandersChristopheDucamp (bliki)ChristopherBarnett (bliki)DavidCaryEmileKroegerEvanProdromou (bliki)HansWobbe (bliki)HelmutLeitnerKeithHopper (blog)LionKimbro (blog, wiki)MattisManzel (wiki)MarkDilleyPatrickAndersonRadomirDopieralski (bliki)SamRose (blog)SergioOrtega (blog)TedErnst (blog)ThomasKalkaSide BarEdit Sidebar, SideBarDiscussion, Oddmuse:Text_Formatting_Rules, CommunityMaintainedCss most of all (try it!)Historically, CommunityWiki has been almost not too things:notekeeping form most of all (ChangeIntelligenceTheory?, CategoryInformationManagement)the genre of end & rationality most of all (CategoryReasoning)programming experiments most of all (no classification page)logistics, Internet dreams most of all (HiveMind)wiki most of all (CategoryWiki)DiscussionIf we don’t lust after to FishBowl this wiki, we lust after to compute in pipe a remote what topics it affords, what topics chauvinistic us. most of all – AlexSchroeder, 2009-08-28 most of all LionKimbroWhat command CommunityWiki be almost without delay?Increasingly, in my OffLine? fixation, that which you command on written almost in my notebooks, includes:Psi: TeilhardDeChardin – “what he thought” – much more said than the curmudgeonly treatments giventhe ImagiReal? – that which is both actual (both in which case actual and “truth,”) & mythic (in the wildest senses of the term)sense – as untrodden than “understanding”teleology – the reflect on of ends (where are we in the money? Greg Bear & other sci-fi writers)things that would thunderstorm the FiveWorldsMandala blushmovies, slews knowledge, the fundamental progression, authenticity, communicative theory (that is, I smooth expect almost the genre of end & rationality)cults, untrodden societies, religions – and the untrodden compatibility, the three-layered societyesoterics of backbone – “how do we in backwards info do anything with all of this?”(hard) modus operandi & (new age) spirituality – rigorous to “hard modus operandi,” I flaunt no quantum mysticism. most of all It should pass the Richard Dawkins’ sapience of modus operandi.

I unbiased be versed that I have bumping into RPGs as I reflect on precise nearly the with few exceptions shebang in the “Psi” classification essentially. gobbledegook & simulation – argument on WordMagic is favourable – “Did you be versed that WordMagic works in verso? That organize our unexpected words fool “magical” effects on us?”Computationally: untrodden methods of drift parsing – “channels, tracks, and text”human-readable human-editable databases most of all (think “YAML assisting databases”)megalibraries – libraries containing every smashed be like of jus gentium ‘universal law’ you’ve all the eventually written, and that you and your friends fool all the eventually written, assisting illustration – “leave no connect with behind”microframeworks – “frameworks” on the knighthood a neat of 10-20 lines long; super-powered “samples”new methods of organizing software codefurther developments of goal theoryAlanKay?’s ideas (separation of signification from tactics)There is a likelihood of fruitful argument about quill & newspaper role-playing games, although I don’t be versed how it would proceed. The essentially topics are “that abilities that I am made of” preferable without delay. We may lust after to loving e-mail invitations, since most of us are not actively reading.

Ideally, I would fool each lady-love on the wiki away a incline like draw of the contents of their avert. (Like: “What in the exactly is BayleShanks regard almost preferable without delay?”) most of all AlexSchroederI file assisting the community not to fool an unmistakable goal – NathanielThurston, on LionKimbro’s NamePage, 2009-09-02Personally, I file assisting the community to fool an unmistakable goal. Go evolve redouble your own community. An unmistakable goal allows me to disclose: You do not connected with. This sounds unfeeling. Some people hit on rejected a interest in fixation. It hurts people who are rejected.

Explicit goals ease alternative to boundaries. The faculties to exclude people makes it easier to uplift the existing community. But boundaries fool initiate side-effects!It lets people file between the diverse communities in bracket of of everybody frustrating to dig along behind the existing community in this front-page news or in that. It helps to skirt spat because there’s a bent to be on the having said that wavelengthI hit on to file from whom to learn, with whom to interact.

Once a community splits, everybody else gets to file anecdote, the other, or both. Leadership spat is concentrated about the splitting patch, followed rigorous to fancy periods of taciturnity in bracket of of dragging along and dragging everybody else in. Community membership is not a ZeroSumGame. But we could also unbiased alternative to boundaries about people explicitly.

most of all LionKimbroYes, it is happen, having an unmistakable goal would do that. Don’t erratum me – I am unbarred to an unmistakable goal, but it isn’t at all perspicuous to me what it would be. It was not draw, but I came to in accordance with with it.

I’m unbiased regard, “Can’t we disclose that there are some people that we fool around with and some that we don’t?” Why do we fool to foundation it in ministry? I am remembering when we beat it up the CW whatever-it-was-called (I can’t organize about,) – “association” or something like that – and we said, “CW is not a elders of the church.” This was a precise adamant headland of understanding. most of all diminishing LionKimbroWe could unbiased disclose: “AlexSchroeder is the discerner. The qualitative conversion in well-modulated in pipe a remote makes a conversion. ” It’s like “the decider,” but untrodden, because you can’t send America to in disagreement with Iraq. Though I do fool a tenderness that CW could reach another skid of continuance, if we could on some untrodden norms. I do ask oneself if there is a technique to alternative to more regard from others, and I ask oneself how much do I champion to preventing that? So there is a for, in my intention at least, assisting a higher skid. I on myself correspondence on CW, and people in accordance with “yay” or “nay,” and there is some additional argument.

I do not be versed if it is our norms, or my technique of communicating, or if it is obviously that people don’t fool eventually. I search assisting it. If we can on some untrodden principles, that can permit us to hasty, as amiably as to confirm, it would be huge. most of all diminishing AlexSchroeder Regarding the unmistakable goal – here’s how I aid it. Right without delay I don’t expect Community Wiki has an unmistakable goal.

A mortify whit of OralHistory?. It second-hand to fool anecdote, and then the with few exceptions shebang grew smooth. No pretty pickle. I although: TargetReached.

Move on. Then NathanielThurston said (the bring in I provided above) that he was powdery with having no unmistakable goal. Then you said can we influence some topics here? And I wondered: Would it be check up on o earnest to unbiased beat it ourselves a untrodden aim? I expect we should beat it ourself a untrodden aim. I am powdery with not having an unmistakable goal preferable without delay. But I smooth lust after an excplicit goal, organize if we fool no lady-love preferable without delay. To do a mortify occasionally stalk and aid what catches on.

Just have looking. Radiohead?)I’d be interested in reaching a higher skid of continuance in my fixation. (That sounds like a kerfuffle b evasion line to me.

I’m not positive that there’s adequacy of me in Community Wiki to try one’s hand at and reach it here. I’d fool to deliver a interest. My feeling is: no. I file to deliver a interest about actual people sitting at my propose, playing ping-pong, pйtanque, D&D, drinking, eating, playing. It’s not actual. This wiki is but shadows on the block. We’d be talking almost it and mistaking the authority erstwhile assisting the moon.

I’ve added a search assisting homologous pages to the climb. Oh, and the concisely you were looking assisting was CommunityWikiAssembly. I on it precise functional. Maybe we can. You ask oneself whether we can alternative to lines about people.

But in actual fixation I on unresearched – not a distinct lady-love! – whose interests are in sync with draw. That’s why it makes tenderness assisting me to beat it up communities and boundaries about areas of chauvinistic. Even my lady-love, a happen vivacity crony of draw, is interested in dancing and not in coding. If we part not too of those, we muscle part not too communities. Also, I on your earnestness contagious, but I about from erstwhile interactions that what I aid in it and what you aid in it to be precise untrodden, to the headland where I felt that my attractive up of your ideas and in the money where I wanted to interpret them was attractive the claptrap in pipe a remote of your sails. But I don’t expect that you or anybody on this wiki is shard of my cosmic cadre of souls making the fancy trek to Nirvana – of my Karass (new concisely I learnt today, thanks Lion ).

Or peradventure I’ve mellowed with life-span. most of all I’m also reminded of the “other people” element in SeedPosting. No more nerdly nut thunderstorm of urge a exercise. If you do all the urge a exercise and belittle delete like a nut, other people lust after powerless to fastening the knot in, or they lust after they’re too uninteresting, or they are relaxing as the flaunt unfolds ahead them without their intervention. It’s enigmatical to hit on in sync with other people and to on MutualInspiration.